Use of titles 

Using the titles Principal, Partner, Director

Under the Uniform Law a principal of a law practice has greater responsibilities and liabilities than an employed legal practitioner. It is important that the title accurately reflects the legal practitioner's position in the law practice. More information on the Legal Services Council website.

Section 6 of the Uniform Law defines a principal of a law practice to be an Australian Legal Practitioner who:

  1. in the case of a sole practitioner – is the sole practitioner 
  2. in the case of a law firm – is a partner in the firm
  3. in the case of a community legal service – is a supervising legal practitioner of the service referred to in section 117
  4. in the case of an incorporated legal practice or an unincorporated legal practice –
    1. holds an Australian practising certificate authorising the holder to engage in legal practice as a principal of a law practice
    2. is –
      1. if the law practice is a company within the meaning of the Corporations Act – a validly appointed director of the company
      2. if the law practice is a partnership – a partner in the partnership
      3. if the law practice is neither – in a relationship with the law practice that is of a kind approved by the Council under section 40 or specified in the Uniform Rules for the purposes of this definition.

Most importantly, misuse of the title principal by legal practitioners who are not principals under the Uniform Law may be misleading or simply untrue and may confuse and mislead the courts, consumers or other members of the legal profession. So, if you are not a principal of a law practice, please do not use that title.

 The terms partner and director are not defined in the Uniform Law and the Board considers those terms should be given their natural and ordinary meaning. The term partner denotes a legal practitioner carrying on legal practice in common with one or more other legal practitioners. The term director denotes a person employed as an officer of an incorporated legal practice and performing the duties of management of the legal practice as a member of the board of directors.

The Board cautions practitioners to be mindful of their legal obligation not to mislead the court, the public, other practitioners and their clients about their position in a law practice and reserves the right to deal with matters where that obligation is shown to have been breached.

Using the term Senior Legal Counsel

As described by the Australian Bar Association, Senior Counsel are barristers of “seniority and eminence”, and “the designation of Senior Counsel provides a public identification of barristers whose standing and achievements justify an expectation, on the part of those who may need their services as well as on the part of the judiciary and the public, that they can provide outstanding services as advocates and advisors, to the good of the administration of justice”.

In addition, Rule 9 of the Legal Profession Uniform General Rules 2015, provides that a person is entitled to use the title Senior Counsel or SC “When the Australian lawyer currently holds the status of Senior Counsel as recognised by the High Court or a Supreme Court of any jurisdiction”.

An enquiry by the Legal Practice Board considered submissions about using the term senior legal counsel in Western Australia by some practitioners who do not hold the status of Senior Counsel. 

The Board is aware that the term senior legal counsel has for many years been used by practitioners employed ‘in-house’ by government entities and private corporations. In view of their limited dealings with the public, the Board considers that there is likely to be less scope for the public to be misled by the term senior legal counsel by such practitioners than by practitioners who are not employed ‘in-house’. 

However, the Board is of the view that use of the word senior in conjunction with the word counsel may be misleading, whatever other descriptor may be employed, depending on the circumstances.

In particular, the Board considers that the term is likely to mislead if used by a practitioner:

  • whether ‘in-house’ or not, in correspondence with, or in the course of participating in any other activities involving, a member of the public (particularly if the member of the public is self-represented)
  • who is not an ‘in-house’ practitioner (particularly if the work of the practitioner involves providing advice about litigious matters or appearing in Court). 

It follows that:

  • care should be taken by any ‘in-house’ practitioner in using the term senior legal counsel, particularly where members of the public are involved
  • the term should not be used by a practitioner engaged or employed in private practice, or by a practitioner engaged in any other capacity where there is potential for a member of the public to be misled.

Finally, the Board cautions all practitioners to be mindful of their legal obligation not to mislead the court, members of the public, other practitioners and their clients regarding the skill, expertise or degree of seniority purportedly held by them, and reserves the right to deal with matters where that obligation is shown to have been breached.

Using the title Special Counsel

After conducting an enquiry into the use of the term special counsel, the Legal Practice Board has decided to take no action prohibiting or otherwise restricting its use.

However, the Board cautions firms to be mindful of their legal obligation not to mislead the court, members of the public, other practitioners and their clients regarding the skill or expertise purportedly held by solicitors employed by the firm; and reserves the right to deal with matters where that obligation is shown to have been breached.

Titles for overseas admitted lay associates

Until further notice, it is the policy of the Legal Practice Board that lay associates in Western Australia who are admitted in an overseas jurisdiction and who are currently undergoing requalification for admission in Australia may be held out under one of the following titles, as appropriate to their seniority and experience:

  • Law Clerk
  • Paralegal
  • Associate (Admitted in [place of admission], not admitted in Australia)
  • Senior Associate (Admitted in [place of admission], not admitted in Australia)
  • Consultant (Admitted in [place of admission], not admitted in Australia)
  • Senior Consultant (Admitted in [place of admission], not admitted in Australia).